
Planning a New Restaurant? Why Acoustics Should Be Part of the Design
Planning a New Restaurant? Why Acoustics Should Be Part of the Design The Noise Problem That Did Not Have to
Every restaurant owner who suspects a noise problem faces the same challenge. The evidence is subjective. Staff say the dining room gets noisy. Reviews mention it. The owner walks through at peak service and agrees that it seems loud. But without a measurement, there is no objective baseline and no way to know how much of a problem actually exists.
Decibel measurement gives that baseline. It turns a subjective impression into a number, which makes it possible to define the problem, design a solution, and measure whether the solution worked.
Decibels are the unit used to measure sound pressure level, which is the physical intensity of a sound wave at a given location. The decibel scale is logarithmic rather than linear, which means that an increase of 10 decibels represents a perceived doubling of loudness, not a 10 percent increase.
This has practical implications for understanding restaurant noise. A dining room at 80 decibels is not slightly louder than one at 70 decibels. It is perceived as roughly twice as loud. The difference between a room at 65 decibels and one at 75 decibels is the difference between a comfortable conversation and one that requires effort.
Common reference points for context:
Restaurant noise levels vary significantly based on occupancy, time of service, and acoustic treatment.
During off-hours or early service with few guests, a typical restaurant sits between 45 and 60 decibels. Ambient music, HVAC, and kitchen sounds contribute to the baseline, but the overall level is comfortable.
During moderate service with tables occupied but not packed, most restaurants reach 65 to 75 decibels. At this level, normal conversation is possible with some effort. Guests may lean in occasionally. The room feels active.
During peak service in an acoustically untreated space, noise levels commonly reach 75 to 85 decibels. At this range, guests must raise their voices significantly to be heard across the table. The Lombard Effect is fully engaged. Staff are straining to hear orders. The dining experience is compromised.
In the loudest untreated restaurant environments, peak levels above 85 decibels are not unusual. This is the range where sustained exposure causes hearing fatigue, which affects both guests and the staff working full shifts in the space.
Reviews that describe a restaurant as “too loud to have a conversation” typically correspond to peak service levels in the 78 to 85 decibel range. Reviews that describe a restaurant as “noisy but manageable” typically correspond to 70 to 78 decibels. These are rough correspondences, but they are useful for calibrating what measurement numbers mean in terms of the guest experience they produce.
Decibel measurement captures how loud a room is at a moment in time. RT60 captures how the room behaves acoustically, which is a more complete picture of the noise problem.
RT60 is the time it takes for sound to decay by 60 decibels after the source stops. It measures reverberation, which is how long sound lingers in the space after being produced. A room with a high RT60 accumulates sound energy because each new sound is produced before previous sounds have fully dissipated.
Two restaurants can measure at the same peak decibel level during service but have very different RT60 values. The restaurant with the longer RT60 will feel harder to be in because the sound is more persistent and more difficult to parse. Speech intelligibility suffers even at moderate volume levels when RT60 is long.
For dining rooms, acoustic professionals generally target an RT60 between 0.6 and 1.0 seconds. This range is live enough that the room feels active rather than dead, but short enough that speech remains intelligible and the Lombard Effect is controlled.
Untreated restaurant dining rooms with predominantly hard surfaces often measure RT60 values of 1.5 to 3.0 seconds or more. A room at the high end of that range can feel genuinely disorienting during busy service, with voices and ambient sounds overlapping in ways that make it difficult to isolate any single conversation.
RT60 measurement is performed using acoustic measurement software. The most widely used tool in professional acoustic assessment is REW, which stands for Room EQ Wizard.
The basic measurement process involves producing a known sound source in the space, typically a starter pistol, a balloon pop, or a sine sweep from a speaker, and recording how long it takes for the sound to decay to the target level. The software analyzes the recording and produces an RT60 value across different frequency bands.
Measuring across frequency bands matters because different frequencies decay at different rates in the same room. A room might have an acceptable RT60 at mid frequencies but an excessively long decay at low frequencies, which creates a boomy, muddy sound character even if the overall measurement seems reasonable. A complete RT60 profile shows the acoustic behavior of the room across the full range of frequencies present during dining service.
Restaurant owners do not need to understand the technical details of RT60 measurement to benefit from it. What matters is that the measurement produces an objective, data-based picture of the acoustic problem in the space, which informs the design of a treatment plan that addresses what is actually happening rather than what is assumed.
Several smartphone applications allow basic decibel measurement using the phone’s built-in microphone. These include NIOSH SLM, Decibel X, and similar tools. They provide a general indication of noise levels and can be useful for getting a rough sense of what peak service sounds like in decibel terms.
Smartphone decibel measurement has significant limitations. The microphones in consumer devices are not calibrated for accuracy, and readings can vary by 5 to 10 decibels or more from actual sound pressure levels. They do not measure RT60. They capture a moment in time rather than the acoustic behavior of the space.
For a general self-check, smartphone measurement is useful. For designing an acoustic treatment plan that specifies the right products, the right placement, and the right coverage area to achieve a target RT60, professional measurement with calibrated equipment is the appropriate tool.
The practical value of knowing the decibel levels and RT60 in your restaurant is that it turns an ambiguous problem into a defined one.
A room measuring 82 decibels at peak service with an RT60 of 2.1 seconds has a specific, measurable noise problem that can be treated to a specific target. The treatment plan is designed to bring the RT60 down to below 1.0 second, which predictably reduces the peak service decibel level and changes the experience in the dining room in ways that guests will notice.
Without measurement, acoustic treatment is speculative. With measurement, it is engineering.
For a broader look at how restaurant acoustics work and how measurement fits into the full treatment process, read our complete guide to restaurant acoustics.
Performance Acoustics is a full-service acoustic treatment company based in Charlotte, NC. Every restaurant project begins with RT60 measurement using REW software to establish an objective baseline before any treatment is specified.

Planning a New Restaurant? Why Acoustics Should Be Part of the Design The Noise Problem That Did Not Have to

How to Reduce Noise in a Restaurant Without a Full Renovation The Question Most Restaurant Owners Are Actually Asking When

Acoustic Treatment for Historic Restaurant Buildings: Challenges and Solutions When the Building Is Part of the Brand Some of the